The politics of value in urban development: Valuing conflict in agonistic pluralism (Record no. 12402)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02794nab a2200289 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220801204518.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McAuliffe, Cameron
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The politics of value in urban development: Valuing conflict in agonistic pluralism
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 18, Issue 3, 2019 : (300-318 p.).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc In this article, we consider the role of value pluralism in theorising urban development and the politics of participatory planning. Rather than situating analyses of urban development in a monist or universalist ethics, where values are reducible to a single universal (e.g. human rights), or a normative pluralism based on the tension between different bearers of political value (e.g. liberty and equality), we argue for a plural ethics to make sense of the complex empirical reality of our cities. Post-consensus theories of planning treat the presence of conflict as an enduring reality in urban development, with Chantal Mouffe providing one way of conceptualising a productive politics of conflict. We extend Mouffe’s plural politics through an appeal to value pluralism in the form of anthropological theories of value. A better understanding of the plural and incommensurable nature of values not only contributes to our understanding of the operation of agonistic pluralism, it also provides a more robust theoretical account of how different urban actors in the city transition from antagonism to agonism, which Mouffe suggests is necessary for a more inclusive urban politics. The politics of value resides in the struggle for legitimacy of particular regimes of value; not just to determine economic value, but to define what value is, and how different values dominate, encompass or otherwise relate to one another. This moral politics approach, via value theory, provides one way of tracing an ethical urbanism that exists between conflict and consensus. It allows us to reframe the central challenge of agonistic pluralism as the transition from antagonistic positions, marked by moral intransigence and immutability, towards more flexible value positions that allow ‘adversaries’ to enter into a viable agonistic politics.
650 ## - Subject
Subject agonistic pluralism,
650 ## - Subject
Subject conflict,
650 ## - Subject
Subject ethics of care,
650 ## - Subject
Subject moral geographies
650 ## - Subject
Subject postpolitical,
650 ## - Subject
Subject urban planning,
650 ## - Subject
Subject value pluralism,
650 ## - Subject
Subject value theory
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Rogers, Dallas
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 8831
Host Itemnumber 16470
Place, publisher, and date of publication London Sage Publications Ltd. 2002
Title Planning theory
International Standard Serial Number 1473-0952
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219831381
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 49089
650 ## - Subject
-- 49090
650 ## - Subject
-- 49068
650 ## - Subject
-- 49091
650 ## - Subject
-- 49092
650 ## - Subject
-- 49093
650 ## - Subject
-- 48993
650 ## - Subject
-- 49094
650 ## - Subject
-- 49095
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 49096
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: library@spabhopal.ac.in

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter