Form and the politics of world /
Material type:
ArticlePublication details: Sage, 2020.Description: vol 10, issue 1, 2020 : (9–18 p.)Online resources:
In:
Dialogues in human geographySummary: In this commentary, I respond to Engelmann, Häkli, Harman and McCormack’s reading of my article, ‘Flat ontology and geography’. In doing so, I argue that a flat ontology of form developed in the article is only a starting point for analysis rather than a fully-fledged theory. In turn, I reflect on how the notion of form can be further developed to identify and analyse mechanisms of inequality that lead to a range of issues for all manner of humans and non-humans.
| Item type | Current library | Vol info | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
E-Journal
|
Library, SPAB | Vol. 10 No.1-3 (2020) | Available |
Total holds: 0
In this commentary, I respond to Engelmann, Häkli, Harman and McCormack’s reading of my article, ‘Flat ontology and geography’. In doing so, I argue that a flat ontology of form developed in the article is only a starting point for analysis rather than a fully-fledged theory. In turn, I reflect on how the notion of form can be further developed to identify and analyse mechanisms of inequality that lead to a range of issues for all manner of humans and non-humans.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.