000 | 01625nab a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c10614 _d10614 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20200915113427.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aGreenhough, Beth _930214 |
||
245 | _aThe promises and pitfalls of specifying situatedness | ||
260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
300 | _aVol 9, Issue 2, 2019:(162-165 p.) | ||
520 | _aIn this commentary, I reflect on the promises and pitfalls of creating a more user-friendly and accessible summary of Haraway’s situated knowledges. I argue that there are clear advantages in revisiting these ideas in order to carefully consider the nature of perception and ask what is at stake in the colonization of critique. I also, however, suggest some limitations to the current reading, taking each of the gaps identified in turn and drawing on ideas from post-structuralism, multispecies ethnography and more-than-human geography as well as my own engagements with Haraway’s work. In closing, I suggest there may be a case for staying with an account of situated knowledges which requires some work before you can make sense of it; an account that slows down reading – and reasoning – to speculate and meander. | ||
650 |
_aDonna Haraway _930215 |
||
650 |
_aspeculative fabulation _930216 |
||
650 |
_asituated knowledges _930211 |
||
650 |
_apost-structuralism _930217 |
||
650 |
_amore-than-human geographies _930218 |
||
773 | 0 |
_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850271 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |