000 01625nab a2200241 4500
999 _c10614
_d10614
003 OSt
005 20200915113427.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aGreenhough, Beth
_930214
245 _aThe promises and pitfalls of specifying situatedness
260 _bSage
_c2019
300 _aVol 9, Issue 2, 2019:(162-165 p.)
520 _aIn this commentary, I reflect on the promises and pitfalls of creating a more user-friendly and accessible summary of Haraway’s situated knowledges. I argue that there are clear advantages in revisiting these ideas in order to carefully consider the nature of perception and ask what is at stake in the colonization of critique. I also, however, suggest some limitations to the current reading, taking each of the gaps identified in turn and drawing on ideas from post-structuralism, multispecies ethnography and more-than-human geography as well as my own engagements with Haraway’s work. In closing, I suggest there may be a case for staying with an account of situated knowledges which requires some work before you can make sense of it; an account that slows down reading – and reasoning – to speculate and meander.
650 _aDonna Haraway
_930215
650 _aspeculative fabulation
_930216
650 _asituated knowledges
_930211
650 _apost-structuralism
_930217
650 _amore-than-human geographies
_930218
773 0 _010527
_915376
_dSage Publications Ltd., 2019
_tDialogues in human geography.
_w(OSt)20840795
_x2043-8214
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850271
942 _2ddc
_cART