000 | 01503nab a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c11190 _d11190 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20210202141924.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 210202b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_a Kash, Gwen _942121 |
||
245 | _aVision Dissonance: Conflicting Conceptions of Bus Sariri | ||
260 |
_bSage, _c2019. |
||
300 | _aVol 39, Issue 3, 2019 ( 332-344 p.) | ||
520 | _aThis article discusses how communication in planning processes can be disrupted by dissonance between stakeholders’ Visions, or mental models of a policy situation. The Vision dissonance framework is used to analyze how frames, paradigms, and theorizations act in concert to shape a stakeholder’s problem definition and problem-solving processes. I examine how Vision dissonance between planners and community stakeholders in El Alto, Bolivia, contributed to the failure of an attempt to introduce high-quality bus service. Because the municipality declined to include meaningful opportunities for public participation, incompatibility between Visions remained submerged until it was too late to reconcile them. | ||
650 |
_acitizen participation, _942122 |
||
650 |
_a international planning and development, _942123 |
||
650 |
_a planning theory, _942124 |
||
650 |
_a politics and society, _942125 |
||
650 |
_atransportation _942126 |
||
773 | 0 |
_011153 _915496 _dSage, 2019. _tJournal of Planning Education and Research |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17745974 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |