000			01907nab a2200277 4500
999			_c11218 _d11218
003			OSt
005			20210203120809.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210203b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWickes, Rebecca _942279
245			_aNeighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion
260			_bSage _c2019
300			_aVol 56, Issue 1, 2019 : (226-248 p.)
520			_aGiven the importance of the neighbourhood context for residents’ social cohesion, the current study examines the association between types of social and non-social places on three indicators of social cohesion: neighbour networks, social cohesion and neighbourhood attachment. We spatially integrate data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, and employ multilevel models to assess whether the variation in resident reports of social cohesion is attributable to land uses that function as neighbourhood social conduits. We also consider the degree to which neighbourhood fragmentation affects our indicators of social cohesion. Our findings reveal that even after controlling for the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood and a range of individual and household control variables, residents’ reports of social cohesion are significantly associated with the types of social conduits, the diversity of land use and the degree of neighbourhood fragmentation.
650			_a built environment _939154
650			_aland use _942280
650			_aneighbourhood _942205
650			_aplace attachment _942281
650			_adiversity/cohesion/segregation _942282
650			_a community _942283
700			_aZahnow, Renee _942284
700			_aCorcoran, Jonathan _942285
773	0		_011188 _915499 _dsage, 2019. _tUrban studies
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018780617
942			_2ddc _cART