000 02357nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11519
_d11519
003 OSt
005 20210312112512.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210312b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aLoftus, Alex
_945169
245 _aIntegrating what and for whom? Financialisation and the Thames Tideway Tunnel
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 56, Issue 11, 2019,( 2280-2296 p.)
520 _aThe Thames Tideway Tunnel (TTT), often referred to as the Thames super sewer, is currently one of the largest infrastructure projects underway in any European city. Costing an estimated £4.2 billion, the sewer connects London’s Victorian sewerage network with the Thames Wastewater Treatment Works at Beckton. The latter facility has been described as the UK’s Water–Energy–Food nexus poster child, for its combination of desalination facilities, green energy generation and wastewater treatment. While physically connected to the Beckton plant, the TTT is, paradoxically, designed with an apparent disregard for the water–energy nexus. If the Beckton plant represents a nexus-based vision of integration – what Macrorie and Marvin (2016) refer to as Mode 2 Urban Integration – the TTT harks back to a view of urban integration carried from the Victorian era through to the present moment. What unites the two projects, and what undergirds the transformation of the hydrosocial cycle, is a financial model more focused on the extraction of rents from Thames Water’s consumers. Thames Water’s dismissal of genuinely integrated alternatives appears guided more by the financialisation of the urban integrated ideal than by what is needed to respond to London’s broader environmental needs. Contesting the project, therefore, will involve slicing through the various claims to integration, going beyond the many proposals for evidence-based alternatives, and capturing the transformations being wrought by finance’s entry into infrastructure provision.
650 _afinancialisation,
_945170
650 _aLondon,
_945171
650 _arent extraction,
_944993
650 _a urban integration,
_945172
650 _awater infrastructure
_945173
700 _aMarch, Hug
_945174
773 0 _011188
_915499
_dsage, 2019.
_tUrban studies
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017736713
942 _2ddc
_cART