000			01745nab a2200241 4500
999			_c11715 _d11715
003			OSt
005			20210611145713.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210611b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGilbert, Emily _946264
245			_aElasticity at the Canada–US border: Jurisdiction, rights, accountability
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 37, Issue 3, 2019 ( 424-441 p.)
520			_aBorders are being stretched as they are deterritorialized, reterritorialized and extra-territorialized. But borders are not only being relocated elsewhere: just as they are extended they are also snapped back into place in order to limit the rights of travellers and migrants, and to deny the accountability of border officials. This elasticity—expansion but also contraction—is the focus of this paper, with particular attention to the Canada–US border with respect to how legal jurisdiction is being reworked territorially, and the ways that the law gets attached to particular bodies. Three contemporary case studies are examined: the Safe Third Country Agreement, the Shiprider program, and the expansion of preclearance programs. While each of these cases is quite different in that they deal with asylum seekers, cross-border policing, and extra-territorial customs programs, together they illustrate how borders are being made elastic, and with what political implications.
650			_aBorders, _946265
650			_aCanada, _946266
650			_aUnited States, _946267
650			_a jurisdiction, _946268
650			_aaccountability _946269
773	0		_08872 _915873 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418787190
942			_2ddc _cART