000			01944nab a22002417a 4500
999			_c11746 _d11746
003			OSt
005			20210616150837.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210616b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHandel, Ariel _946444
245			_aWhat’s in a home? Toward a critical theory of housing/dwelling
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 37, Issue 6, 2019 (1045-1062 p.)
520			_aWhat is a home/house? How can we bridge between the concepts of a house, as a physical structure, and a home, with its symbolic and human meanings? The paper suggests an outline for a theory of housing/dwelling that considers the multiple facets of homes/houses: a top-down manufactured object, an ideal representation of ontological security, and a site of everyday lives and complex social relations. Combining several philosophical backgrounds—phenomenological dwelling, actor-network theory, Foucault’s dispositive, and Illich’s vernacularity—the home/house is investigated along three layers: (1) housing regime, that is the home/house as part of a broader system of planning, economy, or national goals; (2) critical phenomenology, aimed at finding and describing the gaps between the ideal-home image characterizing a given society and the home/house’s actual behavior; and (3) active dwelling, which regarded this gap as an engine for home-making as a political and agentic process. The theoretical arguments are briefly demonstrated through the case study of Palestinian homes/houses in the Occupied Territories, as political sites of both vulnerability and agency.
650			_aHome/house, _946445
650			_a theory of housing, _946446
650			_a dwelling, _946447
650			_aactor-network theory, _943245
650			_aFoucault _946448
773	0		_08872 _915873 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418819104
942			_2ddc _cART