000 02491nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11769
_d11769
003 OSt
005 20210618105616.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210618b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _a Warner, Jeroen
_936860
245 _aSecuritization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 37, Issue 8, 2019(1471-1488 p.)
520 _aIn national and international arenas, climate change and its impact are often framed as a grave global security threat, causing chaos, conflict and destabilising countries. This framing has, however, not resulted in exceptional measures to tame the purported threat. This article examines the workings of such attempts at climate securitization and interrogates its lack of success in galvanizing exceptional action. We do so informed by two cases, which both point to the instrumental nature of these attempts to securitise climate change, often with the intention to use alarming framings to promote rather mundane actions. Also, both cases show that the strategic nature of the speech acts and the aim to make them sound highly dramatic, makes audiences sceptical, thereby weakening their success. Our first case sketches how the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office framed climate change as an existential security threat with a view to enrolling other countries to promote collective climate action. Whilst partially successful on an international level, key audiences – the BRICS countries – remained unconvinced, and the discourse lost support at the domestic level. Likewise, the Dutch Delta State Advisory Commission securitized climate to instil a sense of urgency in the domestic target audience. While initially generating blanket support for the costly spatial Delta interventions it advocated, the mood soon turned. Both cases show that while the tendency to ‘securitize’ climate may be on the rise, instrumental securitization can easily backfire like a ‘policy boomerang’, reinforced by parallel economic and political changes.
650 _aClimate change,
_946566
650 _asecuritization,
_946567
650 _aUK,
_946568
650 _aThe Netherlands,
_946569
650 _aDelta Plan
_945513
700 _a Boas, Ingrid
_946570
773 0 _08872
_915873
_dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010
_tEnvironment and planning C:
_x1472-3425
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419834018
942 _2ddc
_cART