000			02205nab a22002897a 4500
003			OSt
005			20220801204558.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aOrmerod, Emma _949097
245			_aBeyond consensus and conflict in housing governance: Returning to the local state/
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 18, Issue 3, 2019 : (319-338 p.).
520			_aThis article contends that the de-politicizing tendencies in urban planning that are often interpreted through a post-political frame of analysis might alternatively be investigated via the analytical lens of a transforming local state. Examining the formation of entrepreneurial municipal housing strategies in Gateshead, northeast England, the article reveals a recent history of community consensus being manipulated, a technocratic steering of participatory planning and a de-amplifying of dissenting voices. Amid protracted conditions of austerity, the more recent strategy sees Gateshead municipal authority assuming an increasingly ‘promotional’ role, essentially as a housing developer. Placing critical decisions over housing futures within Gateshead Regeneration Partnership, a potentially rough road towards attaining democratic legitimacy is actively being smoothed. These are all trends that are emblematic of a post-political repertoire. However, a more forensic examination reveals how these anti-democratic processes might be more appropriately understood as political accomplishments on the part of those who have been newly incorporated into a local state in transition. The article thereby offers a conceptual antidote to the post-political narrative.
650			_aconsensus, _949069
650			_a consultation, _949098
650			_ahousing regeneration _949099
650			_alocal state, _949100
650			_aparticipation, _948999
650			_a political, _949101
650			_apost-politics, _949071
650			_apromotion _949102
700			_a MacLeod, Gordon _949103
773	0		_08831 _916470 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 2002 _tPlanning theory _x1473-0952
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218790988
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12403 _d12403