000			02312nab a2200253 4500
003			OSt
005			20220803092254.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220722b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_a Kim, Sungyong _949531
245			_aEffects of Multimodal Association on Ambiguous Perception in Binocular Rivalry/
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 9, 2019: (796-819 p.).
520			_aWhen two eyes view dissimilar images, an observer typically reports ambiguous perception called binocular rivalry where the subjective perception fluctuates between the two inputs. This perceptual instability is often comprised of exclusive dominance of each image and a transition state called piecemeal state where the two images are intermingled in patchwork manner. Herein, we investigated the effects of multimodal association of sensory congruent pair, arbitrary pair, and reverse pair on piecemeal state in order to see how each level of association affects the ambiguous perception during binocular rivalry. To induce the multisensory associations, we designed a matching task with audiovisual feedback where subjects were required to respond according to given pairing rules. We found that explicit audiovisual associations can substantially affect the piecemeal state during binocular rivalry and that this congruency effect that reduces the amount of visual ambiguity originates primarily from explicit audiovisual association training rather than common sensory features. Furthermore, when one information is associated with multiple information, recent and preexisting associations work collectively to influence the perceptual ambiguity during rivalry. Our findings show that learned multimodal association directly affects the temporal dynamics of ambiguous perception during binocular rivalry by modulating not only the exclusive dominance but also the piecemeal state in a systematic manner.
650			_aperceptual ambiguity, _949532
650			_abinocular rivalry, _949533
650			_amultimodal association, _949534
650			_adisambiguation, _949535
650			_apsychophysics _949536
700			_aKim, Jeounghoon _949537
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619867023
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12472 _d12472