000 | 01445nab a2200229 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20220803092534.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 220722b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aLuccio, Riccardo _949652 |
||
245 | _aLimits of the Application of Bayesian Modeling to Perception/ | ||
260 |
_bsage _c2019 |
||
300 | _aVol 48, Issue 10, 2019: ( 901-917 p.). | ||
520 | _aThe general lines of Bayesian modeling (BM) in the study of perception are outlined here. The main thesis argued here is that BM works well only in the so-called secondary processes of perception, and in particular in cases of imperfect discriminability between stimuli, or when a judgment is required, or in cases of multistability. In cases of “primary processes,” on the other hand, it is often arbitrary and anyway superfluous, as with the laws of Gestalt. However, it is pointed out that in these latter cases, simpler and more well-established methodologies already exist, such as signal detection theory and individual choice theory. The frequent recourse to arbitrary values of a priori probabilities is also open to question. | ||
650 |
_aBayes’ rule, _949653 |
||
650 |
_a imperfect discriminability, _949654 |
||
650 |
_aassignment of probabilities, _949655 |
||
650 |
_aSDT _949656 |
||
773 | 0 |
_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619868125 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c12491 _d12491 |