000 | 01259nab a2200181 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230315173942.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 220915b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aOswin, Natalie _952910 |
||
245 | _aAn other geography/ | ||
260 |
_bsage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _avol 10, issue 1,2020 : (9–18 p.). | ||
520 | _aThe marginalization, sidelining, erasure and dismissal of ‘othered’ people and epistemologies persist within the discipline of geography today. In the present article, I discuss this fact as a source of harm for many individuals, a result of centuries of white supremacist heteropatriarchal grounding and a failure of the collective critical geographical imagination. A new turn is underway, however, one that turns away from the mainstream of the discipline and toward each ‘other’. Solidarities across modes of difference are building in scholarship that inhabits an epistemological elsewhere, and these can and must be harnessed in this time of serious threats to academic freedom and social justice. | ||
773 | 0 |
_010527 _916533 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619890433 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c12998 _d12998 |