000			01657nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20221029105605.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220916b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGieseking, Jen Jack _952976
245			_aCiting you on behalf of an other digital geographical imagination/
260			_bsage, _c2020.
300			_avol 10, issue1, 2020 : (41–45 p.).
520			_aIn replying to Natalie Oswin’s ‘An Other Geography’, I extend Oswin’s argument for ‘solidarities across modes of difference’ to the place of the scholarly Internet, through the specific case of citation practices. The scholarly Internet—ranging across platforms such as Google Scholar, Socarxiv, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu, to social media including the likes of Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram—affords new connections and communities, particularly over citations that further give voice to the marginalized, erased, and oppressed of geography that Oswin centers in her article. At the same time, most of these software reproduce whiteness, sexism, heteronormativity, ableism, and colonialism in their algorithmic biases. I urge geographers to reconsider their attachments to and expectation of the scholarly Internet, particularly around citation practices. Instead, I call for practices of survival for Others that must necessarily include, in the words of Carrie Mott and Daniel Cockayne, conscientious engagement and disengagement.
773	0		_010527 _916533 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619898896
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13023 _d13023