000			01987nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20220929221446.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220929b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRigolon, Alessandro _953495
245			_aGreen gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?/ _cAlessandro Rigolon
300			_aVol 57, issue 2, 2020 : (402–420 p.)
520			_aRecent research shows that the establishment of new parks in historically disinvested neighbourhoods can result in housing price increases and the displacement of low-income people of colour. Some suggest that a ‘just green enough’ approach, in particular its call for the creation of small parks and nearby affordable housing, can reduce the chances of this phenomenon some call ‘green gentrification’. Yet, no study has tested these claims empirically across a sample of diverse cities. Focusing on 10 cities in the United States, we run multilevel logistic regressions to uncover whether the location (distance from downtown), size and function (active transportation) of new parks built in the 2000–2008 and 2008–2015 periods predict whether the census tracts around them gentrified. We find that park function and location are strong predictors of gentrification, whereas park size is not. In particular, new greenway parks with an active transportation component built in the 2008–2015 period triggered gentrification more than other park types, and new parks located closer to downtown tend to foster gentrification more than parks on a city’s outskirts. These findings call into question the ‘just green enough’ claim that small parks foster green gentrification less than larger parks do.
700			_aNémeth, Jeremy _953496
773	0		_08843 _916581 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 _tUrban studies _x0042-0980
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13178 _d13178