000			01831nab a2200205 4500
003			OSt
005			20221105171534.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			221007b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLu, Tingting _953928
245			_aThe variegated role of the state in different gated neighbourhoods in China/ _cTingting Lu
260			_aLondon: _bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 57, issue 8, 2020: (1642–1659 p.)
520			_aHousing commodification has led to the development of gated neighbourhoods in China. However, the types of gated neighbourhoods are very different from each other, and include ‘commodity housing’, affordable housing and resettlement housing. They might not be the same as the commonly known ‘gated communities’, which are characterised by both gating and private governance. Using three cases in the city of Wenzhou, we analyse the motivations for development, service provision and property management, and neighbourhood control. In commodity housing, the state is still visible and self-governance is limited, while the real estate developer leads land development and property management. In affordable housing, the state regulates the standards and the prices of services, while the developer is the provider of these services. In resettlement housing, the state uses a state-owned enterprise to relocate households, while the homeowners’ association and the service charges are ineffective. All these cases demonstrate the important and variegated role of the state and provide a more nuanced understanding of these gated neighbourhoods.
700			_aZhang, Fangzhu _953560
700			_aWu, Fulong _953762
773	0		_08843 _916581 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 _tUrban studies _x0042-0980
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019838423
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13320 _d13320