| 000 | 01031nab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230315174615.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 230315b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aAsh, James _955182 |
||
| 245 | _aForm and the politics of world / | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _avol 10, issue 1, 2020 : (9–18 p.). | ||
| 520 | _aIn this commentary, I respond to Engelmann, Häkli, Harman and McCormack’s reading of my article, ‘Flat ontology and geography’. In doing so, I argue that a flat ontology of form developed in the article is only a starting point for analysis rather than a fully-fledged theory. In turn, I reflect on how the notion of form can be further developed to identify and analyse mechanisms of inequality that lead to a range of issues for all manner of humans and non-humans. | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_010527 _916533 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/204382062094005 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
| 999 |
_c13565 _d13565 |
||