000			02093nab a22002297a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230316172248.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230316b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c
100			_aCorbera, Esteve _955185
245			_aTroubled Encounters: _bPayments for Ecosystem Services in Chiapas, Mexico /
260			_bWiley, _c2020.
300			_aVol 51, issue 1, 2020 : (167-195 p.).
520			_aPayments for Ecosystem Services (PES) is a well-established conservation policy approach worldwide. Where forests are owned and managed by rural and indigenous communities, PES initiatives often aim to incentivize the joint adoption of forest protection and sustainable management practices. However, not all communities might have the will or capacity to maintain such practices over the long term. This article examines a PES programme in a rural community of Chiapas, Mexico. It shows that while a majority of the community's landowners have engaged in PES through two distinct working groups, a large share of the community forests remain outside the PES programme, and many landowners resist the extension of PES rules to non-targeted forests. The authors argue that this incipient form of fragmented collective action on forest management results from challenged leaderships, and from PES accommodating a history of increasing individuation of the commons. This accommodation, however, has ignited social conflict, reified tenure inequalities, and failed to strengthen local institutions to enable them to legitimately deal with the contested interests that underpin the fate of community forests. This article shows the limits of PES when parachuted into a context of uneven land tenure, weak collective action and contested leaderships.
700			_a Costedoat, Sébastien _955195
700			_a Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss _955196
700			_aHecken, Gert Van _950221
773	0		_08737 _916865 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X
856			_u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12540
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13573 _d13573