000			01946nab a22001937a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230316172745.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230316b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c
100			_aShapiro-Garza, Elizabeth _955183
245			_aAn Alternative Theorization of Payments for Ecosystem Services from Mexico: _bOrigins and Influence /
260			_bWiley, _c2020.
300			_aVol 51, issue 1, 2020 : (196-223 p.).
520			_aThe national Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programmes of Mexico were originally based on the neoclassical economic theory that conceptualized ecosystems as factories whose various outputs can be quantified and converted to commodities. This model of PES clashed with an alternative theorization, Compensation for Ecosystem Services (CES), with home-grown roots in the ontological orientation and contextualized experience of an epistemic community of public intellectuals with deep engagement in rural Mexico. While built upon the same basic premise — that healthy ecosystems produce services of value — the CES model reimagines payments as compensation for the sustainable stewardship and labour of rural communities and, mediated by the state, as a means to counteract the systemic structural inequities between rural and urban and global North and South. Based on discourse analysis of a series of key actor interviews, longitudinal participant observation and policy analysis, this article explores: 1) the common conceptual underpinnings in the theory of CES, but also the variances; 2) the specific influence of this model on the design of the national PES programmes; and 3) the ways in which this influence has been mediated by politics and shifting relations of power in Mexico.
773	0		_08737 _916865 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X
856			_u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12552
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13574 _d13574