000 | 01521nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230719163953.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aCargile, Ivy A. M. _956007 |
||
245 |
_aContext Not Candidate Sex: _bA Case Study of Female Vote Choice for Mayor/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 56, Issue 6, 2020:( 1659-1686 p.). | ||
520 | _aIt is expected that women who run for office will receive significantly more support from women relative to male voters. However, evidence for this gender affinity has been mixed. In fact, recent experimental studies, and elections, have not found it to exist for female candidates. To test the presence of gender affinity, we examine the case where voters have the opportunity to elect the first female mayor in a major US city. Using exit poll data, we find that women (and men) who cited gender as an important quality in choosing a candidate were significantly more likely to support the female candidate, but only a small portion of voters felt gender was the most important candidate quality. For the majority of women, we find that there were confounding factors, such as uncertainty of the female candidate’s leadership skills and issue positions, which prevented her from gaining the majority she needed to win. | ||
700 |
_aPringle, Lisa _956008 |
||
773 | 0 |
_09296 _916911 _dSage Publications _tUrban Affairs Review |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419861697 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c13866 _d13866 |