| 000 | 01335nab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230731160059.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 230731b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aGivoni, Moshe _956573 |
||
| 245 | _aRethinking Transport Infrastructure Planning to Extend Its Value over Time/ | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _aVol 40, Issue 1, 2020 ( 82–91 p.). | ||
| 520 | _aContemporary transport infrastructure planning typically rests upon the core belief that physical mobility has inherent advantages and that more of it will always yield better socioeconomic outcomes. Such an embrace of maximum growth yields a misguided calculus for planning transport infrastructure. Rather than seeking to meet the demand for future mobility by reflexively expanding the quantity of infrastructure, there is a need to consider alternatives that can support a sustainable future. By applying the “half-life” concept to transport infrastructure, this article explores alternatives to extending its use over time that can open up new possibilities for generating and extending its value to society. | ||
| 700 |
_aPerl, Anthony _956574 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_09172 _917020 _dSage, _t Journal of Planning Education and Research _x 0739-456X |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17741196 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
| 999 |
_c14119 _d14119 |
||