000 | 01358nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230802154609.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230802b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aPfau, Ann _956678 |
||
245 |
_aNewburgh’s Last Chance: _bElusive Promise of Urban Renewal in a Small and Divided City/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 19, Issue 3, 2020:( 144-163 p.). | ||
520 | _aThis article is a case study of failure at the federal, state, and local levels. In 1956, Newburgh, New York, undertook an ambitious, arguably oversized, urban renewal program. Between 1962 and 1974, city officials successfully cleared roughly 120 acres of prime waterfront real estate for redevelopment, displacing a largely black population. But combined with economic recession and changing federal and state policies, conflict between and among white city officials and black residents prevented reconstruction. Newburgh's greatest assets were its scenic waterfront and historic architecture. Clearance of the former led to destruction of the latter. Newburgh's waterfront remains largely empty even today. | ||
700 |
_aSewell, Stacy Kinlock _956679 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08811 _917021 _dThousand Oaks Sage Publications 2002 _tJournal of planning history _x1538-5132 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1538513219897996 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14161 _d14161 |